This article attempts to confine itself to discussion of relativism in morality and ethics. For other manifestations of relativism, see relativism.
In philosophy, moral relativism takes the position that moral or ethical propositions do not reflect absolute and universal moral truths, but instead make claims relative to social, cultural, historical or personal references. Moral relativism also suggests that no single standard exists by which to assess an ethical proposition's truth. Relativistic positions often see moral values as applicable only within certain cultural boundaries or in the context of individual preferences. An extreme relativist position might suggest that judging the moral or ethical judgments or acts of another person or group has no meaning, though most relativists propound a more limited version of the theory.
More on [ Moral relativism ]

Ethics Updates: Relativism and Pluralism - Web links; literature survey; and some questions to ponder and discuss.
Stand to Reason Commentaries -- Ethics - Many of these refute relativism.
Catholic Information Center on the Internet - Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger calls ethical relativism the central problem for faith today.
Is Morality a Matter of Taste? - An article describing the philosophical justification for rejecting purely subjective ethics.
Moral Relativism - A critical look at arguments for and against moral relativism.
Meta Description: [ A critical look at moral relativism, the philosophical theory that morality varies between individuals and cultures and so there is no objective right and wrong. ]
404
Objectivity and Truth - paper by Ronald Dworkin (published in PPA). Is there any such thing as objective truth in ethics or aesthetics?
| Re: On Morality | |
| Next Video | |